What your report looks like
This is an example for a fictional company, "Atlas, Inc." Your reports run on the real names you track, with live web search across Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, on a schedule or on demand.
Sample report
Web searchAtlas, Inc.
Across the four assistants, Atlas is described as a well-regarded project-management tool known for a clean interface and fast setup. Praise centers on usability and customer support. The most common criticism is mobile-app stability, which several models raise unprompted. Sentiment ticked up since the last report, tracking a positive product update and fresh press coverage.
"Atlas is widely praised for an intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Reviewers highlight responsive support, though a few mention the mobile app can feel less polished than the web app."
"Most coverage of Atlas is favorable, pointing to strong collaboration features and good value. Some users say reporting is thinner than larger competitors offer."
"Atlas is generally well-reviewed for design and reliability on the web. Recent notes mention a redesigned mobile experience that addresses earlier complaints."
"People like Atlas overall, though a vocal minority call the mobile app clunky and ask for more integrations. Pricing is seen as fair for small teams."
Overall score (0–100) across your last 8 reports.
Where the models drew their answers from on the live web.
How often the models mention Atlas, Inc. vs the alternatives they bring up.